Cat proc cpuinfo address size4/5/2023 ![]() Sorry for the delay in reply, but I wanted to collect as much > - LPA via CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52, and > - LVA via CONFIG_ARM64_FORCE_52BIT > The easiest way a user can determine the physical/virtual > addresses supported on the hardware, is via the '/proc/cpuinfo' > interface. > Since at the moment we enable the support of these extensions via CONFIG > flags, e.g. > Hi Bupesh > On 20:57, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > With ARMv8.2-LVA and LPA architecture extensions, arm64 hardware which > supports these extensions can support upto 52-bit virtual and 52-bit > physical addresses respectively. Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" ClamAV using ClamSMTPĪrm64: Expose physical and virtual address capabilities to user-spaceīhupesh Sharma Jan. To: arm64: Expose address bits (physical/virtual) via cpuinfo X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdJtjTchmx29+fVIymqfnHKxkkKUwhebOVvhLyb/8feqYySaPqVĪLg8bN4orZzcqOHj8OHbMsFULsWO/IfKBSnX9lT44jv8xoAjql3zrlXz0azFqyDe4RMW4V9fQ7Gwag= Q0OETuIg+Jc+PJhQhstDo9g1vDCe8xDShistULjSzAs0Yb+VrmrWq5AGc9BZhODA++qK KGT1a2KC24j9jeLuf8bsBM957ZTb1C0x7V1jjyfwF+z37yMCN8qqUQ1keXoG9IFhO2zrĭQMeb圜RHBbuptItierBJbKox0gCtTcyVrQu3Ryulb//GDGpGry780CmuHD2I31iYdTA +hUmE9Dbhf5ySMQWgq7WjxY6oORPB1Qwm6i4YXK9bhn7xY+AnW1ET9Fzyv3NjBe0Ziz1 H=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-toīh=GHnHUPZ9AIS/dpbTBE3AlHpiE3cNPGmxAHjPVpSOKXI= ī=kpT1qzBXxMwsIuSb8vJoQZC9shCapcvn1cOiIxffjqLnODGuAZaj5+UWoTGCH6p/Za X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1 a=rsa-sha256 c=relaxed/relaxed Received: by with SMTP id e5so8292669plb.5 Received: from ()īy with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) Received: from localhost ( helo=)īy with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) X9C1+4oGfwad/jZoO4tbjej7u6RdZBkT1B3lYZPzm9RF3YfdnIa9rXbgPxSmk3jz1tC4xuOwcvroCģMAsokcblU99LxBCsVfk+knFlRoVgGh6UObGuS/BaqYZ圎9dtqEBJsGMQ8d908XC2qcmpEcD4Bsr7 In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Ĭontent-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Ccīh=DwrUV3J8zMqGKoTPwN+JfUBsQWoH8IhBM8/rkNg5syw= b=nmsoppbhg/a7ac/RkPqMoOyoyIĭNmTKFdXXpGQneC/+YNWDovCmbkrmWt3tT8HOkTlmFEhMx8aIPzDCzdnattM75bUnB8CDOrJVgtPXĭKuV7Ve2c1+UZlT10S5ySdVMVgmW/kIMGoW5FeIZK4kvsaWnR7Kj5pfmUbZwYq1HnTqRZ元oNdizC List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))īy mail.wl. (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41FD229AA8ĭKIM-Signature: v=1 a=rsa-sha256 q=dns/txt c=relaxed/relaxed ĭ= s=bombadil.20170209 h=Sender:Ĭontent-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,ĭKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 () on ![]() Received: by mail.wl. (Postfix, from userid 486) Received: from mail.wl. (localhost )īy mail.wl. (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC3329AA8 Received: from mail.wl. (īy (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3321390 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |